![]() “It’s always a huge loss to see them dismantled … It’s not necessarily a weakening to change organizational structure, but it does seem to be a bad sign. “Dedicated teams bring strength and consistency to the task of covering environment-related issues,” she said. “Fortunately, we still have those reporters who cover climate change so well, and we expect to cover the subject just as aggressively going forward,” he said.īeth Parke, executive director of the Society of Environmental Journalists, said that while solid environmental coverage doesn’t always require a dedicated team, the Times’ decision is “worrying.” On Thursday, Kramon responded to questions from InsideClimate News in an email. “I ask myself, ‘In 20 years, what will we be proudest that we addressed, and where will we scratch our head and say why didn’t we focus more on that?'” Kramon said. Times assistant managing editor Glenn Kramon told The Daily Climate that “climate change is one of the few subjects so important that we need to be oblivious to cycles and just cover it as hard as we can all the time.” dailies, the Times published the most stories and had the biggest increase in coverage. News that the New York Times is closing its environmental desk comes just a week after The Daily Climate reported that worldwide coverage of climate change continued a three-year slide in 2012-and that among the five largest U.S. Baquet said editors are also considering whether religion reporting could benefit from this type of change. The paper did a similar restructuring of its education desk a few months ago. No decision has been made about the fate of the Green Blog, the online site for the Times’ daily coverage of energy and environment news. Baquet said he will meet with each of them to discuss their next assignments and the future of their beats. The environmental reporters were told of the decision on Wednesday. We need to have people working on the different desks that can cover different parts of the story.” But today, environmental stories are “partly business, economic, national or local, among other subjects,” Baquet said. It was pre-fracking and pre-economic collapse. When the desk was created in early 2009, the environmental beat was largely seen as “singular and isolated,” he said. Instead, Baquet said the change was prompted by the shifting interdisciplinary landscape of news reporting. But Baquet said the decision to dismantle the environment desk wasn’t linked to budgetary concerns and that no one is expected to lose his or her job. 3 the Times announced that it was offering buyouts to 30 newsroom managers in an effort to reduce newsroom expenses. ![]() We have not lost any desire for environmental coverage. We devote a lot of resources to it, now more than ever. “To both me and Jill, coverage of the environment is what separates the New York Times from other papers. “It wasn’t a decision we made lightly,” said Dean Baquet, the paper’s managing editor for news operations. No decision has been made about the fate of the Green Blog, which is edited from the environment desk. The positions of environment editor and deputy environment editor are being eliminated. The New York Times will close its environment desk in the next few weeks and assign its seven reporters and two editors to other departments. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |